In the stance detection task, a text is classified as either favorable, opposing, or neutral towards a target. Prior work suggests that the use of external information, e.g., excerpts from Wikipedia, improves stance detection performance. However, whether or not such information can benefit large language models (LLMs) remains an unanswered question, despite their wide adoption in many reasoning tasks. In this study, we conduct a systematic evaluation on how Wikipedia and web search external information can affect stance detection across eight LLMs and in three datasets with 12 targets. Surprisingly, we find that such information degrades performance in most cases, with macro F1 scores dropping by up to 27.9\%. We explain this through experiments showing LLMs' tendency to align their predictions with the stance and sentiment of the provided information rather than the ground truth stance of the given text. We also find that performance degradation persists with chain-of-thought prompting, while fine-tuning mitigates but does not fully eliminate it. Our findings, in contrast to previous literature on BERT-based systems which suggests that external information enhances performance, highlight the risks of information biases in LLM-based stance classifiers. Code is available at https://github.com/ngqm/acl2025-stance-detection.

Aspect-based sentiment analysis has gained significant attention in recent years due to its ability to provide fine-grained insights for sentiment expressions related to specific features of entities. An important component of aspect-based sentiment analysis is aspect extraction, which involves identifying and extracting aspect terms from text. Effective aspect extraction serves as the foundation for accurate sentiment analysis at the aspect level. In this paper, we propose aspect extraction models that use different types of embeddings for words and part-of-speech tags and that combine several learning models. We also propose tree positional encoding that is based on dependency parsing output to capture better the aspect positions in sentences. In addition, a new aspect extraction dataset is built for Turkish by machine translating an English dataset in a controlled setting. The experiments conducted on two Turkish datasets showed that the proposed models mostly outperform the studies that use the same datasets, and incorporating tree positional encoding increases the performance of the models.

Such fine-tuning Stance detection is a fundamental computational approaches can benefit from both the general language task that is widely used across many disciplines understanding from the pre-training as well such as political science and communication studies as the problem-specific thing, even without spending (Wang et al., 2019b; Küçük and Can, 2020) Its a huge amount of computing resources (Wang goal is to extract the standpoint or stance (e.g., Favor, et al., 2022a). Against, or Neutral) towards a target from a More recently, the GPT family of models (Radford given text. Given that modern democratic societies et al., 2019; Brown et al., 2020) birthed another make societal decisions by aggregating people's explicit powerful and even simpler paradigm of incontext stances through voting, estimation of peoples' learning ("few-shot" or "zero-shot"). Instead stances is a useful task. While a representative survey of tuning any parameters of the model, it is the gold standard, it falls short in scalability simply uses the input to guide the model to produce and cost (Salganik, 2019). Surveys can also produce the desired output for downstream tasks. For biased results due to the people's tendency to instance, a few examples related to the task can be report more socially acceptable positions even in fed as the context to the LLM.

People use the world wide web heavily to share their experience with entities such as products, services, or travel destinations. Texts that provide online feedback in the form of reviews and comments are essential to make consumer decisions. These comments create a valuable source that may be used to measure satisfaction related to products or services. Sentiment analysis is the task of identifying opinions expressed in such text fragments. In this work, we develop two methods that combine different types of word vectors to learn and estimate polarity of reviews. We develop average review vectors from word vectors and add weights to this review vectors using word frequencies in positive and negative sensitivity-tagged reviews. We applied the methods to several datasets from different domains that are used as standard benchmarks for sentiment analysis. We ensemble the techniques with each other and existing methods, and we make a comparison with the approaches in the literature. The results show that the performances of our approaches outperform the state-of-the-art success rates.

This study enhances stance detection on social media by incorporating deeper psychological attributes, specifically individuals' moral foundations. These theoretically-derived dimensions aim to provide a comprehensive profile of an individual's moral concerns which, in recent work, has been linked to behaviour in a range of domains, including society, politics, health, and the environment. In this paper, we investigate how moral foundation dimensions can contribute to predicting an individual's stance on a given target. Specifically we incorporate moral foundation features extracted from text, along with message semantic features, to classify stances at both message- and user-levels across a range of targets and models. Our preliminary results suggest that encoding moral foundations can enhance the performance of stance detection tasks and help illuminate the associations between specific moral foundations and online stances on target topics. The results highlight the importance of considering deeper psychological attributes in stance analysis and underscores the role of moral foundations in guiding online social behavior.

ChatGPT, the first large language model (LLM) with mass adoption, has demonstrated remarkable performance in numerous natural language tasks. Despite its evident usefulness, evaluating ChatGPT's performance in diverse problem domains remains challenging due to the closed nature of the model and its continuous updates via Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). We highlight the issue of data contamination in ChatGPT evaluations, with a case study of the task of stance detection. We discuss the challenge of preventing data contamination and ensuring fair model evaluation in the age of closed and continuously trained models.